Sign Up for a Free Account
  • Updated 04.05.2011
  • Released 08.08.2001
  • Expires For CME 04.05.2014

Shaken baby syndrome

Introduction

Overview

Shaken baby syndrome, a condition that was first identified decades ago, came into the forefront in the mid-1990s with a nanny case in Massachusetts. Since then, there has been vigorous debate on the mechanism of the injury caused by shaking, namely subdural hematomas, diffuse axonal injury, retinal hemorrhages, and fracture of posterior and anterlateral ribs or metaphyses of long bones. In this update, the diagnostic indicators to help identify infants who have been shaken and ways to help prevent shaken baby syndrome issues are discussed.

Historical note and terminology

The recognition that subdural hematoma and multiple long bone fractures were due to trauma was first made by John Caffey in 1946 (17). The term “whiplash shaken baby syndrome” was used by Caffey in 1972 to explain the combination of infantile subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage, traction type metaphyseal fractures, and retinal hemorrhage found in multiple injured infants in the care of a nurse maid who admitted to vigorously shaking them in order to burp them (18). It was thought that the unique anatomy of the infant's head (disproportionately large with weak supporting neck musculature and relatively higher water content) made infants vulnerable to severe injury from shaking (32). Although the diagnosis was made on the basis of clinical and radiological findings, this term implied a specific mechanism of angular deceleration as a cause of cerebral concussion and subdural hematoma. Many others reported clinical and laboratory evidence for the damaging effects of angular acceleration during this time (68; 69). Central to this concept was the idea that caretakers might inflict these injuries unwittingly during the course of generally acceptable means of punishment or even play (19). Controversy exists as to the mechanism of actual injury. The term “shaken baby syndrome” has been questioned, as more recent series using clinical, biomechanical, radiological, and autopsy analysis suggest that many, if not most, cases have evidence of blunt impact to the head. Deceleration forces generated by shaking alone may not be of sufficient magnitude to cause the injuries seen compared to those caused by impact. The absence of scalp injuries may be secondary to dissipation of forces against a soft, padded surface (34; 27). Some authors prefer to use the term "shaking impact syndrome" to suggest the importance of angular deceleration as a mechanism of injury (16; 28). Leaders in the field of child maltreatment have suggested that a more medically descriptive term such as inflicted traumatic brain injury be used instead, as the term “shaken baby syndrome” implies knowledge of the exact cause of injury (75).

Start a MedLink Neurology trial
to unlock 3 free articles.

  • Nearly 3,000 illustrations, 
including video clips of 
neurologic disorders.

  • Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.

  • Full spectrum of 
neurology in 1,200 
comprehensive articles.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink, LLC

10393 San Diego Mission Rd, Suite 120

San Diego, CA 92108-2134

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com