Dr. Thomas of Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.)
Dr. Gondim of Universidade Federal Ceará & Unichristus, Fortaleza, Brazil, received consulting fees from Alnylan.)
Dr. Weimer of Columbia University has received consulting fees from Roche.)
This article includes discussion of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1B, CMT1B, hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy 1B, hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 1B, HMSN1B, and myelin protein zero. The foregoing terms may include synonyms, similar disorders, variations in usage, and abbreviations.
In the general population approximately 1 in 30,000 individuals suffers from Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1B (CMT1B). Considering that the prevalence of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in general is 1 in 2500, this subtype is, thus, a relatively rare form. Although several new gene loci and genes are reported each year for novel subtypes, CMT1B remains among the best studied forms. In this article, the authors include advances in our understanding of the clinical phenotype and the relation between particular mutations and the specific clinical and histological changes they cause.
• Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1B affects about 1 out of 30,000 individuals in the general population.
• It has an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.
• It is caused by mutations in the myelin protein zero gene.
• It is usually characterized by childhood, slowly progressive peripheral nerve manifestations with distal dominant weakness, sensory loss, and limb deformities (pes cavus).
• Demyelinating changes by neurophysiological and histological criteria are characteristic.
Historical note and terminology
The Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease entity was recognized independently in Great Britain and France (Charcot and Marie 1886; Tooth 1886). Several earlier descriptions had been published, including a 6-generation pedigree by Eichhorst in 1873. A more severe form of inherited neuropathy was described a few years later (Dejerine and Sottas 1893). A source of confusion was the description of a progressive childhood neuropathy associated with tremor (Roussy and Levy 1926), which has been defined genetically (Auer-Grumbach et al 1998; Plante-Bordeneuve et al 1999). Different forms of inheritance were later recognized (Allan 1939). Since the late 1960s, the clinical and pathological spectrum has been defined, and a classification system based on 7 types of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy has been introduced including HMSN1 and HMSN2 (Dyck and Lambert 1968; Harding and Thomas 1980).
HMSN1 is the most common form of hereditary neuropathy, characterized by severely and uniformly slowed nerve conduction velocities and primary hypertrophic myelin pathology with prominent onion bulbs and secondary axonal changes. HMSN2, on the other hand, represents the nondemyelinating neuronal type with relatively normal nerve conduction velocities and primary axonal pathology. In the neuronal form (HMSN2) characteristically nerves are not enlarged, weakness is often less marked, and onset is generally later, although the distinction is difficult to make in individual patients by history and exam alone. Although the separation of neuronal and nonneuronal forms is an important etiologic and pathogenic distinction, it is noteworthy that even in HMSN1, the clinical deficits appear to correlate better with progressive axonal degeneration than slowed nerve conduction. This fact is not surprising, given the fact that demyelination disturbs axonal structure and transport. The distinction between demyelinating and nondemyelinating hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy has been called into question by a report of relatively normal nerve conduction velocities suggestive of HMSN2 in younger members of a family with a myelin protein zero mutation, whereas older relatives had severely slowed conduction consistent with HMSN1 (De Jonghe et al 1999). As a dividing value between both forms, nerve conduction velocities of 38 m/s are used by some, and nerve conduction velocities of 42 m/s are used by others (Harding and Thomas 1980; Kaku et al 1993). Because nerve conduction velocities within and between type 1 families range from normal or near normal to severely abnormal, the diagnostic usefulness of this parameter has its limits.
The hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease classification system also covers hereditary motor neuropathies and hereditary sensory neuropathies and refers to other conditions linked to specific chromosomal regions or genes such as CMT2 and CMT4 with several subtypes.
In the 1980s, linkages to chromosomes 1, 17, and X were recognized for certain Charcot-Marie-Tooth pedigrees, and Charcot-Marie-Tooth was subcategorized to cover CMT1A, aka hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy 1A (70% to 80% of CMT1), CMT1B, aka hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy 1B (4% to 5% of CMT1), and CMTX (Fischbeck et al 1986; Vance et al 1989; Lebo et al 1991) (15% of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease). In 1991, 2 groups showed that CMT1A, the most common form of CMT1 disease, was associated with a 1.5 mB duplication within chromosome 17p11.2 (Raeymaekers et al 1991). Some 90% of CMT1A cases result from this duplication (Patel and Lupski 1994). Mutations in the peripheral myelin protein 22 kD (PMP22) gene, contained within the 1.5 kB duplication on chromosome 17, have been demonstrated to cause demyelinating neuropathies in Trembler and Trembler-J mice as well as in some CMT1A and CMT3 patients (Nelis et al 1994). Moreover, transgenic mice and rats overexpressing PMP22 develop neuropathies resembling CMT1 (Sereda et al 1996). An approximately 1.5 mB long deletion of the proximal short arm of chromosome 17 is detected in most families with hereditary neuropathy with predisposition to pressure palsy (Chance et al 1993), whereas about 14% to 25% of patients develop hereditary neuropathy with predisposition to pressure palsies due to other PMP22 mutations (Nelis et al 1996). The deletion includes all markers duplicated in CMT1A. Several nondeletion mutations have been identified, such as nonsense mutations with a stop codon at G183A (Trp61stop) and G372A (Trp124stop); frameshift mutations with a premature termination at 19-20delAG and 434delT or with a longer transcript at 281-282insG; splice site mutations at 78+1G>T, 179+1G>C; and missense mutations at G208A (Val30Met) in exon 3 (Lenssen et al 1998). A similar condition, hereditary brachial plexus neuropathy or hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy with predilection for the brachial plexus, is not linked to the PMP22 locus but was mapped to chromosome 17q25 (Pellegrino et al 1996).
The 1990s also saw the identification of other Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease genes, including myelin protein zero for CMT1B and CMT3 (Hayasaka et al 1993; Kulkens et al 1993; Su et al 1993) and the gap junction protein connexin 32 or beta 1 on chromosome Xq13.1 for the more common CMTX1 (Bergoffen et al 1993), whereas the rare CMTX2 was mapped to chromosome Xq24-26 (Priest et al 1995), and the zinc-finger domain containing transcription factor early growth response 2 gene for congenital hypomyelination neuropathy and CMT1D (Warner et al 1998). Mutations of all of these genes have been associated with several overlapping clinical phenotypes. For instance, Dejerine-Sottas syndrome is associated with PMP22 or myelin protein zero mutations or deletions (Nelis et al 1996; Warner et al 1996; De Jonghe et al 1997).
Several new disease linkages and genes have been identified, which include 2 signal transduction genes: the N-MYC downstream-regulated gene-1 (NDRG1) on chromosome 8q24.3 for the Lom form of autosomal recessive motor and sensory neuropathy (Kalaydjieva et al 2000); the gene for the phosphatase myotubularin-related protein-2 (MTMR2) on chromosome 11q22 for autosomal recessive CMT4B (Bolino et al 2000); a cytoskeletal gene, the neurofilament light subtype gene on chromosome 8p21 for CMT2E (Mersiyanova et al 2000); the periaxin gene on chromosome 19q13.1-2, which is regulated by EGR2, for recessive Dejerine-Sottas syndrome (Boerkoel et al 2001); the gene for a serine palmitoyltransferase subunit on chromosome 9q22 for hereditary sensory neuropathy type 1 (Bejaoui et al 2001; Dawkins et al 2001); and the gene involved in axonal organelle transport on chromosome 1p36-35 for CMT2A (Zhao et al 2001). A demyelinating neuropathy also results in some Pelizaeus-Merzbacher patients from absent proteolipid protein expression. Mutations in the cytoskeletal protein gigaxonin have been linked to giant axonal neuropathy (Bomont et al 2000). A locus for autosomal dominant CMT2F was found on chromosome 7q11-q21 (Ismailov et al 2001).
Loci with several candidate genes have been identified in 2 families with autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and conduction velocities between 24 and 54 m/s. These include 1 on chromosome 19p12-p13.2 (Kennerson et al 2001), the other associated with both large fiber loss and regeneration clusters as well as onion bulbs, and uncompacted enlarged myelin lamellae on chromosome 10q24.1-q25.1 (Malandrini et al 2001; Verhoeven et al 2001). A recessively inherited severe form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with intermediate conduction velocities has been linked to chromosome 10q23 (Rogers et al 2000). Intermediate conduction velocities also occur with myelin protein zero and neurofilament light subtype gene mutations (De Jonghe et al 1999).
Overall, some 100 genes are known at present for the different forms of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
The content you are trying to view is available only to logged in, current MedLink Neurology subscribers.
If you are a subscriber, please log in.
If you are a former subscriber or have registered before, please log in first and then click select a Service Plan or contact Subscriber Services. Site license users, click the Site License Acces link on the Homepage at an authorized computer.