The American Thoracic Society has published an official clinical guideline on the evaluation and management of obesity hypoventilation syndrome in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
Obesity hypoventilation syndrome is a breathing disorder that affects some people who are obese, causing them to have too much carbon dioxide and too little oxygen in their blood. Medically, obesity hypoventilation syndrome is defined by the combination of obesity (body mass index ?30 kg/m2), sleep-disordered breathing and awake daytime hypercapnia (awake resting partial pressure of arterial CO2 or PaCO2 ?45 mmHg at sea level), after excluding other causes for hypoventilation.
Studies have estimated that 8% to 20% percent of obese patients with sleep apnea have this potentially life-threatening condition. According to the authors of the guideline, most patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome are undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, jeopardizing their health and resulting in increased health care costs.
"The purpose of the guideline is to improve early recognition of obesity hypoventilation syndrome and advise clinicians concerning the management of obesity hypoventilation syndrome, with the goal of reducing variability in clinical practice and optimizing the evaluation and management of patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome," said guideline panel chair Babak Mokhlesi MD MSc, a pulmonologist and a sleep specialist who is a professor of medicine and director of the Sleep Disorders Center and the Sleep Medicine Fellowship training program at the University of Chicago. "The panel believes that early recognition and effective treatment of obesity hypoventilation syndrome are important in improving morbidity and mortality."
The panel of 18 experts who produced the guideline included pulmonologists with expertise in sleep-disordered breathing, sleep specialists, a respiratory therapist, a critical care physician, a pulmonary hypertension specialist, an expert in weight reduction and a patient. The group reviewed the results of a systematic search of clinically relevant questions and focused on patient-centered outcomes, such as improving quality of life and quality of sleep, daytime sleepiness, gas exchange, need for supplemental oxygen, hospital resource utilization and death.
Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, the panel made five recommendations:
All the recommendations were deemed "conditional" by the panel because of the "very low level of certainty in the evidence."
The authors of the guideline noted several opportunities for research that they believe would benefit patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Randomized trials, they wrote, are needed to determine which is better for screening obese patients with sleep-disordered breathing for obesity hypoventilation syndrome: measuring bicarbonate levels or oxygen saturation.
Studies are also needed to evaluate the impact of various positive airway pressure modes in obesity hypoventilation syndrome patients who do not have severe obstructive sleep apnea, whether patients suspected of obesity hypoventilation syndrome but discharged from the hospital without a diagnosis should continue on positive airway pressure treatment until an outpatient study confirms or rules out obesity hypoventilation syndrome and which bariatric weight-loss interventions are most effective in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome.
The panel emphasized that clinicians caring for these patients should consider severe obesity a major, modifiable factor in the development and severity of obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Clinicians need to educate their patients and engage in shared decision making about the best strategy for their patients to sustain weight loss of at least 25% to 30%, which the authors said is needed to resolve obesity hypoventilation syndrome.
In making its recommendations, the panel aimed for guidelines that could be used internationally. The authors recognize, however, that local resources may guide decisions within the framework on the panel's recommendation.
The authors emphasized that each patient is different, medically and personally. "No recommendation can take into account all of the variable and often compelling circumstances that might affect the potential benefits, harms and burdens of an intervention in specific cases and contexts," they wrote. Therefore, the guidelines should not be applied "in a blanket fashion."
Source: News Release
American Thoracic Society
August 1, 2019