Generalized myasthenia gravis
Study 1 (described below), which established the effectiveness of efgartigimod alfa-fcab for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis in adults who are AChR antibody-positive, was conducted with the efgartigimod alfa-fcab intravenous formulation. In Study 2, efgartigimod alfa and hyaluronidase-qvfc demonstrated a comparable pharmacodynamic effect on AChR antibody reduction as compared to the efgartigimod alfa-fcab intravenous formulation, which established the efficacy of efgartigimod alfa and hyaluronidase-qvfc.
Study 1 (efgartigimod alfa-fcab intravenous). The efficacy of efgartigimod alfa-fcab intravenous (EFG IV) for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis in adults who are AChR antibody positive was established in a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Study 1; NCT03669588).
Study 1 enrolled patients who met the following criteria at screening:
| • Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinical classification class II to IV |
| • MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total score of 5 or greater |
| • On stable dose of myasthenia gravis therapy before screening, that included acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, steroids, or nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapies, either in combination or alone |
| • IgG levels of at least 6 g/L |
A total of 167 patients were enrolled in Study 1 and were randomized to receive either EFG IV 10mg/kg (1200 mg for those weighing 120 kg or more) (n=84) or placebo (n=83). Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Patients had a median age of 46 years at screening (range: 19 to 81 years) and a median time since diagnosis of 7 years. Seventy-one percent were female, and 84% were White. Median MG-ADL total score was 9, and median quantitative myasthenia gravis total score was 16. The majority of patients (n=65 for EFG IV; n=64 for placebo) were positive for AChR antibodies.
At baseline, over 80% of patients in each group received AChE inhibitors, over 70% in each treatment group received steroids, and approximately 60% in each treatment group received nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapies at stable doses.
Patients were treated with 10 mg/kg EFG IV administered as an intravenous infusion over one hour once weekly for 4 weeks. In patients weighing 120 kg or more, EFG IV was administered as 1200 mg per infusion. Subsequent treatment cycles were administered based on clinical evaluation, but no sooner than 50 days from the start of the previous treatment cycle.
The efficacy of EFG IV was measured using the Myasthenia Gravis-Specific Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL), which assesses the impact of generalized myasthenia gravis on daily functions of eight signs or symptoms that are typically affected in generalized myasthenia gravis. Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale where a score of 0 represents normal function and a score of 3 represents loss of ability to perform that function. A total score ranges from 0 to 24, with the higher scores indicating more impairment. In this study, an MG-ADL responder was defined as a patient with a 2-point or greater reduction in the total MG-ADL score compared to the treatment cycle baseline for at least 4 consecutive weeks, with the first reduction occurring no later than 1 week after the last infusion of the cycle.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparison of the percentage of MG-ADL responders during the first treatment cycle between treatment groups in the AChR-Ab positive population. A statistically significant difference favoring EFG IV was observed in the MG-ADL responder rate during the first treatment cycle (67.7% in the EFG IV-treated group vs 29.7% in the placebo-treated group [p <0.0001]).
The efficacy of EFG IV was also measured using the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total score, which is a 13-item categorical grading system that assesses muscle weakness. Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale where a score of 0 represents no weakness and a score of 3 represents severe weakness. A total possible score ranges from 0 to 39, where higher scores indicate more severe impairment. In this study, a QMG responder was defined as a patient who had a 3-point or greater reduction in the total QMG score compared to the treatment cycle baseline for at least 4 consecutive weeks, with the first reduction occurring no later than 1 week after the last infusion of the cycle.
The secondary endpoint was the comparison of the percentage of QMG responders during the first treatment cycle between both treatment groups in the AChR-Ab positive patients. A statistically significant difference favoring EFG IV was observed in the QMG responder rate during the first treatment cycle (63.1% in the EFG IV-treated group vs 14.1% in the placebo-treated group [p <0.0001]).
For details of study results, see the Clinical Studies section of the DAILYMED drug label information.
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
The efficacy of efgartigimod alfa and hyaluronidase-qvfc for the treatment of adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy was established in a two-stage, multicenter study (Study 3; NCT04281472). Study 3 included an open-label period to identify efgartigimod alfa and hyaluronidase-qvfc responders (stage A) who then entered a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal period (stage B).
Study 3 enrolled male and female patients aged 18 years and older, who at the time of screening, had a documented diagnosis of definite or probable chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy using the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS, 2010) criteria for progressing or relapsing forms.
The Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability score (INCAT) is a scale used to assess the impact of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy on daily upper and lower limb function, and is composed of the arm score and leg score (0 to 5 points for each). A total score on the INCAT ranges from 0 to 10 points, with a higher number representing more disability. The adjusted INCAT (aINCAT) disability score, identical to the INCAT disability score but with changes in the upper limb function from 0 (normal) to 1 (minor symptoms) excluded, was used to assess efficacy for efgartigimod alfa and hyaluronidase-qvfc for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.
Stage A. In stage A, a total of 322 patients received up to 12 once-weekly subcutaneous injections of efgartigimod alfa and hyaluronidase-qvfc 1008 mg/11,200 units until evidence of improvement occurred at two consecutive study visits. Improvement was defined as aINCAT improvement of 1 or more points, I-RODS improvement of 4 or more points, or a mean grip strength improvement of 8 or more kPa. Stage A included 228 patients currently receiving standard-of-care therapy and 94 patients who had either not received prior treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or were not treated with standard-of-care therapy for at least 6 months before study entry. Sixty-nine percent of patients (n=221) who had documented improvement at two consecutive visits during Stage A then entered Stage B.
Stage B. In stage B, a total of 221 patients were randomized to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of efgartigimod alfa and hyaluronidase-qvfc 1008 mg/11,200 units (n=111) or placebo (n=110).
Baseline characteristics of patients in stage B were similar between treatment groups. Patients had a median age of 55 years (range: 20 to 82 years), a median time since chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy diagnosis of 2.2 years, and a median INCAT score of 3.0. Sixty-four percent were male and 65% were White, 30% Asian, and 1% African American.
Stage B included 146 patients currently receiving standard-of-care therapy and 75 patients who had either not received prior treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or were not treated with standard-of-care therapy for at least 6 months before study entry.
The primary endpoint was the time to clinical deterioration, defined as a 1-point increase in aINCAT at two consecutive visits or a more than 1-point increase in aINCAT at one visit. Patients who had clinical deterioration or completed week 48 in Stage B without clinical deterioration were withdrawn from the placebo-controlled portion of the study. The study stopped when 88 events of clinical deterioration occurred for the primary endpoint analysis.
Patients who received efgartigimod alfa and hyaluronidase-qvfc experienced a longer time to clinical deterioration (ie, increase of ≥1 point in aINCAT score) compared to patients who received placebo, which was statistically significant, as demonstrated by a hazard ratio of 0.394 (95% CI [0.253; 0.614] p<0.0001). The results are presented in Table 3 and Figure 3.
For details of Study 3 results, see the Clinical Studies section of the DAILYMED drug label information.