Sign Up for a Free Account
  • Updated 09.10.2025
  • Released 12.19.2015
  • Expires For CME 09.10.2028

Autoantibodies: disease markers

Authors
Monica Budianu MD, Kareena Kumar, Phildrich Teh MD, Erin Tullis MD
See Contributor Disclosures
Editor
Anthony T Reder MD
Cite this article

Cite this article

Introduction

Overview

Advances over the last couple of decades in the field of autoimmune neurology, specifically relating to autoantibody discovery, are tremendous. The number and incidence of known autoreactive antibodies have increased over time due to the ongoing discovery of these biomarkers (197). The discovery of certain antibodies like AQP4 Ab and MOG Ab has led to the recognition of new neurologic disease entities. In the case of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes, autoreactive antibodies may be directly pathogenic and cause neurologic clinical symptoms; in other cases, they represent an epiphenomenon with no clearly identified role in the pathogenesis or a post-infectious process (as with anti-NMDAR encephalitis after herpes simplex virus encephalitis) (13). Detection of autoreactive antibodies helps to establish a diagnosis and also helps detect occult malignancies. Testing autoreactive antibodies can be quite expensive. Therefore, to avoid futile tests, it is important to know their sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis or the possibly associated cancer. The reliability of the techniques used for antibody detection is also reviewed in this article.

Key points

• Autoreactive antibodies against central or peripheral nervous system antigens may be useful for diagnosing several neurologic diseases.

• In paraneoplastic neurologic disorders, their detection can also help identify an associated cancer at a stage before it is clinically overt, potentially leading to early successful therapy.

• Testing autoreactive antibodies might often be quite expensive.

• The sensitivity and specificity and the reliability of the commercially used techniques are important to evaluate to avoid useless tests.

Historical note and terminology

Autoreactive antibodies occur in various neurologic disorders involving the central and peripheral nervous system. These antibodies may be directly responsible for the disease process or represent an epiphenomenon without having a specific pathogenic role. The role of autoreactive autoantibodies is well-established in the pathogenesis of neuromuscular junction disorders such as myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Myasthenia gravis was first proposed as an autoimmune disorder by Simpson in 1960 (173). The association of anti-acetylcholine receptor (anti-AChR) antibodies with myasthenia gravis was first reported in the 1970s (06). The presence of antibodies to a defined antigen specific to the disease process, clinical response to immunomodulatory therapy, and transmission of the disease to animals by passive transfer of immunoglobulins provide evidence for antibody-mediated autoimmune mechanisms in this and in other neurologic disorders of the peripheral nervous system.

In the CNS, however, the pathogenic role of autoantibodies is not as well-defined and relies on their temporal relationship with the disease onset and the response to immunological therapies. The CNS disorders associated with autoreactive antibodies can be divided into those with known autoantigens, such as neuromyelitis optica with circulating antibodies to aquaporin-4 (108). Similar to myasthenia gravis, there are some patients in whom the association is tight and others in whom no antibodies are identified despite a typical clinical picture. There are other disorders in which no specific antigen has yet been identified, such as multiple sclerosis (102). Various autoreactive antibodies, including anticardiolipin, antinuclear, and antithyroid antibodies, which are usually associated with specific vasculitic or systemic syndromes, may occur in multiple sclerosis patients. Autoimmune diseases do not seem to occur with higher frequency in patients with multiple sclerosis and their family members (152).

Autoantibodies against central or peripheral nervous system antigens can, eventually, occur in paraneoplastic neurologic disorders. Although a pathogenic role for autoantibodies has been established only for some paraneoplastic neurologic disorders, the presence of autoantibodies can be extremely important in the diagnostic workup. In fact, the clinical symptoms and antibodies associated with paraneoplastic neurologic disorders precede the detection of a tumor by several months in almost 80% of patients, and positron emission tomography might detect a tumor or tumor recurrence in 90% of antibody-positive paraneoplastic neurologic disorder patients (112; 79). These antibodies are sometimes highly specific for a particular cancer and can help identify it at a stage before it is clinically overt, potentially leading to early successful therapy.

This article evaluates the usefulness of autoantibody testing for diagnosing neurologic diseases, reviewing the sensitivity and specificity of autoantibody testing. When sensitivity and specificity are indicated or can be calculated from the data of relevant papers, the number of patients and healthy controls or other neurologic disease patients will also be indicated to show reliability.

Autoantibodies are detected with different immunoassays. Both serum and CSF testing are recommended in the evaluation of patients with autoimmune CNS disorders. Some antibodies detected in the CSF are of greater clinical importance than when they are found in serum only (eg, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA-R] IgG); in contrast, some antibodies, such as aquaporin-4 IgG and LGI1-IgG serum specimens, may be preferred (their sensitivity is higher in the serum than in the CSF). MOG-IgG is more readily detected in the serum than CSF, but recent evidence demonstrated that a subgroup of MOGAD patients may harbor CSF exclusive antibodies (117). The presence of CSF antibodies in MOGAD and LGI1 encephalitis appears to be associated with more severe disease (24; 122).

Screening using two methods is recommended for most antibodies, particularly paraneoplastic antibodies.

Tissue-based assays. Tissue-based immunofluorescence assays are performed using cryosections of adult murine tissue immobilized on glass slides. Patients’ antibodies are identified in the brain tissue of rodents or primates. The antigen-antibody complex is stained with anti-human-IgG chemically linked to a fluorophore (indirect immunofluorescence) or conjugated to an enzyme, such as peroxidase, that can catalyze a color-producing reaction (indirect immunohistochemistry).

Immunoblot. Antibodies are identified as specific bands. Patients’ antibodies are separated through gel electrophoresis by size, charge, or other differences in individual proteins. Separated antibodies are then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and are identified by specific antibodies. The antigen-antibody complex is stained with peroxidase-conjugated anti-human-IgG.

Cell-based assays. These are commercially available fixed cell-based assays, which can be transported and stored easily. Patients’ antibodies are identified on suitable cell lines (eg, HEK293 cells) transfected with an eukaryotic expression vector (plasmid) encoding the antigen.

The patient sample is incubated with cells (either live or fixed) that express the target protein. An anti-human secondary antibody conjugated with a fluorophore is introduced. Seropositivity is determined by visual observation on a fluorescence microscope.

For neural antibodies that target extracellular antigens, cell-based assay provides higher sensitivity with retained specificity when compared to tissue-based immunofluorescence assays or other protein-specific assays.

For some autoantibodies, live cell-based assays (where the patient antibody is incubated with live cells at 4 degrees) appear to be more sensitive than fixed cell-based assays. Live cell-based assays are more labor intensive, have a shorter time window for use, and are usually performed only in specialized research centers.

Live cell-based flow cytometry has proven especially useful for the detection of aquaporin 4 and MOG IgG. HEK-293 cells are transfected with plasmid encoding both GFP and the protein of interest. This method has a greater clinical sensitivity compared to other assays for aquaporin 4 IgG and a specificity of 100%. This technique has greater sensitivity when compared to fixed cell-based assay for the detection of MOG IgG but has comparable sensitivity to live direct-visualization cell-based assay (200).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A recombinant antigen is immobilized on a solid support, and the detection antibody is added, forming a complex with the antigen. The antigen-antibody complex is then stained with peroxidase-conjugated anti-human-IgG. This technique allows the determination of antibody titer.

When an autoantibody test is useful for a disease diagnosis, the most relevant technique for each test will also be indicated. This will provide clinicians with important information on autoantibodies that are really useful in the correct diagnosis.

Radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPA). Radioimmunoprecipitation assays are a sensitive quantitative method for rapidly assessing for the presence and positive values of antigen-specific antibodies, which is particularly useful for detection of antibodies even at low concentrations (eg, detection of GAD-65 IgG in the CSF, where very low concentrations carry clinical significance) (61).

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

  • Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.

  • Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.

  • Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.

  • Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125