Neuro-Oncology
Vestibular schwannoma
May. 27, 2026
MedLink, LLC
3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122
Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400
US Number: +1-619-640-4660
Support: service@medlink.com
Editor: editor@medlink.com
ISSN: 2831-9125
Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400
US Number: +1-619-640-4660
Support: service@medlink.com
Editor: editor@medlink.com
ISSN: 2831-9125
Worddefinition
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas.
Alexia without agraphia (also known as “pure alexia” or “word blindness”) is an acquired disorder in which patients become unable to read but are still able to write. The deficit has been attributed to either a disconnection syndrome or a word form agnosia.
|
• Alexia without agraphia is either a disconnection between language cortex and visual cortex or a word form visual agnosia. | |
|
• It occurs from lesions in the left occipitotemporal region and splenium of the corpus callosum. | |
|
• It is often accompanied by a right homonymous hemianopia. | |
|
• Diagnosis is based on discovering the characteristic clinical and imaging features and excluding other conditions that might interfere with reading, such as developmental dyslexia, ocular and visual pathway disorders, eye movement abnormalities, aphasia, and hemispatial neglect. |
Alexia without agraphia (also called “pure alexia” and “word blindness”) refers to an impairment in reading with preservation of the ability to write. In its most severe form, it involves an inability to read letters. In its milder form, the patient can read letters but cannot read words.
In 1892, Déjérine first described this entity in a man with associated incomplete right homonymous hemianopia from a lesion of the left fusiform and lingual gyri. He deduced that the left angular gyrus stored the visual representation of words needed for reading and writing and that disconnecting the visual inputs of both hemispheres from the left angular gyrus could disrupt reading but leave writing intact (34; 17). These conclusions were affirmed in 1965 by Geschwind, who introduced the concept of “cerebral disconnection” (41).
Patients can write fluently and spontaneously but cannot read what they have written. In milder cases, reading is slow and effortful, and words are read one letter at a time, creating a characteristic "word length effect," in which the time to read a word increases with the number of letters it contains (20; 27). This deficit is called “letter-by-letter reading” or “spelling dyslexia.” In severe cases, patients cannot even read letters, a defect that may extend to numbers or other symbols, such as musical notation or map symbols (18; 49). Some authors suggest the term “visuographemic alexia," for this deficit, which is believed to be an inability to map the visual letter symbol to its abstract meaning (30).
In Japanese, which has two different writing systems, kana (phonetically based form) and kanji (non-phonetic, ideographic form), alexia without agraphia can selectively impair either form (48; 79) or impair both forms (78). Dissociations in bilingual patients can also occur, with the more recently acquired language being less affected (64), perhaps in keeping with the hypothesis that the right hemisphere is involved in new language acquisition. In patients with long-standing blindness, newly acquired alexia without agraphia may impair Braille reading even when there are no somatosensory deficits (44).
Patients with alexia without agraphia are able to recognize handwriting and font. This ability is impaired in patients with right fusiform gyrus lesions associated with prosopagnosia (72; 10). In a case report, a multilingual patient could easily identify the language of written words despite having difficulty reading them (35). Evidently some aspects of text processing are spared by left-sided lesions causing alexia without agraphia, suggesting hemispheric specialization for the type of information being extracted from written text. One study demonstrated alexia without agraphia to be associated with deficits in processing of facial features that led to difficulty in lip reading, a visual aspect of language. This deficit was more pronounced for line-drawn facial images than full content (grayscale) facial images (04).
Alexia without agraphia is often part of a triad that includes a right homonymous hemianopia and right hemiachromatopsia. The homonymous hemianopia is sometimes limited to the superior quadrants of the visual field and may exist without the hemiachromatopsia (31). Alexia may also occur without homonymous hemianopia (36). In some cases, there is an inability to name colors (“color anomia”) even though the colors are visible in the normal left hemifield, and when the ability to match colors is preserved (31; 91; 45; 36).
Verbal memory deficits and visual object agnosia may also be present (31; 33), as well as an inability for the right hand to accurately target objects in the left visual field (“disconnection optic ataxia”) (31).
In the presence of a stable lesion, some improvement in reading may occur. Among eight patients with pure alexia, five (63%) recovered, two (25%) died, and one (13%) did not recover after 2 years (96). A patient with a left fusiform gyrus lesion demonstrated improvement in perception of words but retained letter-by-letter reading. Based on functional MRI imaging, the authors attributed the recovery to reinforcement of parallel reading routes that bypassed the lesion to reach the occipital cortex (23).
A 58-year-old woman presented with a generalized seizure. Imaging revealed a tumor in the left occipital lobe, which on resection proved to be a glioblastoma multiforme. She had received radiation treatment for the lesion and was in remission when referred 9 months later. She reported profound problems with reading, especially of long words, but no other cognitive complaints. She displayed a dense macular-splitting homonymous hemianopia. She read with a letter-by-letter strategy, slowly and with great effort, taking more time to read long words. Repeat imaging at the time of examination, and after a 6-month interval, showed that the tumor and surrounding edema had extended to the anterior and medial left occipital lobe and splenium.
Alexia without agraphia is almost always caused by a lesion in the left hemisphere, most commonly in the medial and inferior occipitotemporal region (31; 18; 82). Many cases have lesions that involve the splenium or callosal fibers, a feature critical to the disconnection hypothesis. However, some cases also have lesions involving the left mid-fusiform gyrus, which is the basis of the “word form agnosia” hypothesis (67; 82). A single case report described a right occipital lesion in a right-handed person (75).
Most cases of alexia without agraphia are due to left posterior cerebral artery infarction. This condition can also rarely result from left carotid artery disease if the left posterior cerebral artery originates from the carotid artery rather than the basilar artery (“fetal origin”) (73). Alexia without agraphia may be a presentation of COVID-19 (68; 05). In that condition, patients are subject to arterial and venous infarctions due to a hypercoagulable state.
Other causes include primary and metastatic tumors (91), arteriovenous malformations (03; 19), lobar hemorrhages (45), nonconvulsive status epilepticus (53), multiple sclerosis (59), eclampsia (77), posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (21), herpes simplex encephalitis (36), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (02), cysticercosis (93), posterior cortical atrophy (89; 37), scrub typhus (42), and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with monoclonal antibody (06).
A macular-splitting right homonymous hemianopia can slow reading (“hemianopic dyslexia”) and suggest alexia without agraphia. However, most patients with homonymous hemianopia do not have impaired reading. Moreover, alexia without agraphia can occur without homonymous hemianopia. Two studies have established that the word-length reading impairment in alexia without agraphia cannot be attributed to visual field loss (83; 07).
There are two principal pathophysiologic explanations of pure alexia: visuoverbal disconnection and word form visual agnosia.
Visuoverbal disconnection. The traditional explanation for alexia without agraphia is a disconnection of vision from language centers (34; 41). When there is a complete right homonymous hemianopia, intact vision in the left hemifield is processed by the right occipital cortex. However, the transfer of visual data to language centers in the left angular gyrus is interrupted when the occipital lesion also involves callosal fibers in the splenium, forceps major, or periventricular white matter surrounding the occipital horn of the lateral ventricle (31). Alexia without agraphia in the absence of right homonymous hemianopia is caused by a lesion of the white matter underlying the angular gyrus. Such “subangular” lesions cause an interruption of input just as it is reaching the angular gyrus. Most of the projection fibers travel ventral to the occipital horn (45). If the dorsal projections to the angular gyrus are spared, the alexia might be incomplete (“spelling alexia”) (18). Alexia limited to the right hemifield may be due to disruption of the intra-hemispheric occipital white matter tract (Barton el al 2022).
Support for the visuoverbal disconnection hypothesis comes from cases with multiple distinct lesions. Alexia without agraphia has been observed in these atypical cases, such as those involving a combination of a splenial lesion and a left lateral geniculate nuclear lesion causing right homonymous hemianopia (87; 88). These cases lack damage to the striate or extra-striate cortex, ruling out agnosia or simultanagnosia. Thus, they support the hypothesis that visuoverbal disconnection alone is sufficient to cause alexia without agraphia.
Word form agnosia. A second hypothesis is that alexia without agraphia is a specialized visual agnosia called “word form agnosia.” (94; 92; 16; 61; 56; 76; 65). The alexic deficit is magnified with brief presentation of words and cursive script rather than print (94). In a single patient with alexia without agraphia, there was increased difficulty identifying words acquired at an older age compared with those acquired at a younger age (29). Along with the letter-by-letter reading strategy and the word length effect, these phenomena are ascribed to difficulty perceiving words as whole, unitary structures.
The visual agnosia may not be specific for words. For example, a patient with pure alexia without agraphia had difficulty perceiving complex textures, a problem with local pattern analysis that may be relevant to word perception (72). Others have shown that alexia without agraphia can be associated with subtle disturbances in visual recognition of nonverbal items (15; 85). This agnosia may be restricted to the visual domain. When tested on imagery of letters and words, a patient was able to read more correctly when allowed to trace letters manually than when asked to mentally manipulate visual images of letters (08). A visual word form agnosia may also explain why some patients with alexia without agraphia have subtle writing problems, consisting of a surface dysgraphia, in which their spelling relies on phoneme-to-grapheme rules. They have trouble reading words with irregular spelling, like “yacht” and “colonel” (70; 78) perhaps because they have trouble accessing an internal lexicon for writing purposes.
Studies with functional MRI suggest the existence of a visual word form area in the left fusiform gyrus (60), a component of a larger network involved in reading (71). Some authors speculate that the visual agnosia of alexia without agraphia represents disruption of this visual word form area (22). A study of patients with hemianopic dyslexia and those with alexia without agraphia suggested that damage to the region of the visual word form area was specific to the latter group (67). A survey of a large group of patients with left hemispheric strokes suggested that disruption of this fusiform region is specifically associated with computing grapheme sequences, that is, small letter strings that convey meaning when assembled into words (46). Additional support for the role of the visual word form area in alexia without agraphia comes from studies of patients with surgical lesions examined with functional neuroimaging. These studies show that in patients who become alexic postoperatively, the lesion destroys either the visual word form area (40) or the adjacent white and gray matter (25), possibly causing deafferentation of the word form area. Intraoperative cortical stimulation of a region corresponding to the left visual word form area was shown to cause a temporary alexia without agraphia (58).
Developmental dyslexia. Alexia without agraphia is an acquired disorder, distinguishing it from developmental dyslexia, a disorder of reading competency first noted when a child is learning to read. The origin of developmental dyslexia remains unsettled, although there is a suggestion of dysfunction in the rapid magnocellular stream of stimulus processing (69; 84).
Developmental dyslexia has two forms: surface dyslexia and phonological dyslexia. Surface dyslexia presents with an inability to pronounce irregular words like “yacht” and “colonel” due to loss of an internal dictionary (81; 28), whereas phonological dyslexia involves the loss of general pronunciation rules and hinderance in pronunciation of pseudo-words or new words (39; 38).
Detailed neuroimaging studies of subjects with developmental dyslexia display loss of gray matter in the fusiform gyri bilaterally (52). In Japanese patients, alexia for kana (syllabograms) that spares reading for kanji is associated with fusiform lesions (80) and reduced activation on functional MRI (74).
Visual disorders. Reading may be impaired in patients with bilateral reduction in visual acuity of ocular or cerebral origin. To distinguish alexia from impaired acuity or ocular or visual pathway origin, visual acuity should be tested with a nonletter optotypes, although that method is unfamiliar to examiners and provides less standardized measurement.
Bitemporal hemianopia can also impair reading. The fact that no region of the visual field is represented in both eyes leads to unstable binocular alignment. As the eyes wander between esotropia and exotropia, words transiently double or disappear during reading (51).
Homonymous hemianopia affecting the central five degrees slows reading speed (90). Left-to-right reading is generally slowed more by right than left homonymous hemianopia (32; 90). Left homonymous hemianopia slows reading speed as patients have difficulty finding the beginning of new lines (90). Right homonymous hemianopia slows reading speed because readers do not see the endings of words (32; 90). However, the slowing of reading speed by homonymous hemianopias is not nearly as great as that of alexia without agraphia (67).
Aphasia. Impaired reading is a component of many aphasic disorders. Testing auditory and oral linguistic skills will readily reveal these nonvisual elements and lead to the correct diagnosis.
Hemispatial neglect. Patients with left hemispatial neglect make left-sided reading errors known as “neglect dyslexia” (14). They omit the left side of lines and make left-sided omissions, additions, or substitutions with words. Vertical text is not affected (14). Rarely, it may occur without other signs of hemispatial neglect (66). Accompanying visuospatial dysfunction often causes readers to jump around in text and to omit or double up on words.
Eye movement disorders. Acquired ocular motor apraxia from bilateral frontal or parietal lesions can impair reading (47; 11). Inaccurate or delayed saccades to nonverbal targets are found. Accompanying signs include simultanagnosia and optic ataxia. Interruption of fixation by saccadic intrusions, such as ocular flutter or opsoclonus, will disrupt reading.
A diagnosis of alexia without agraphia requires exclusion of ocular, visual pathway, ocular motor, and visuospatial dysfunction, as well as aphasia, all of which could interfere with reading. A simple maneuver to confirm the diagnosis is to instruct the patient to spell common words and then to write them to dictation, tasks that should be successfully completed. After a pause, the patient is instructed to read those words. In alexia without agraphia, that task should be flawed. With spelling dyslexia, reading fails because letters are misidentified. In the less penetrating form of alexia, the reader stumbles or fails only on longer words. If allowed to trace the written letters, reading should improve, as the patient uses somatosensory input in place of visual input to access language cortex.
Neuroimaging with MRI is important for lesion detection. FDG positron emission tomography has been reported to show hypometabolism when MRI appears normal (43). Functional imaging studies have implicated an area in the left lateral fusiform gyrus known as the “visual word form area” (24).
There is paucity of controlled trials regarding rehabilitation of alexia without agraphia (86). However, many imaginative ways have been applied, including phonological and orthographic training, reading-aloud training, and semantic feature analysis. Phonological training involves teaching patients to use phonological strategies to decode words, whereas orthographic training focuses on improving recognition of whole words (13). Reading-aloud training involves practicing reading aloud, enhancing oral articulation during reading (26), and repetitive oral reading of text (12). Semantic feature analysis involves identifying semantic features of words to aid in word retrieval (13). This approach includes altering text to highlight the spacing between words or phrases (12; 57), attempts to enhance implicit or covert processing of whole words (57; Friedman and Lott 2000; 01). Finger tracing of letters also works but is laborious (57; 63).
Others have tried a “face font” that uses faces to represent phonemes and found that a patient was able to learn this nonalphabetic reading system, although not at the level of control subjects (62). Functional improvements in whole-word recognition were associated with changes in reading network connectivity as measured with magnetoencephalography following therapy designed to enhance processing of whole words (95). Enhancement of behavioral training and favorable changes on functional MRI followed transcranial direct current stimulation therapy (54). A controlled trial also found a small facilitatory effect of transcranial direct stimulation on word reading accuracy (50).
The success of these approaches in improving both speed and accuracy requires further evaluation and will likely require tailoring to the specific reading defect (55).
All contributors' financial relationships have been reviewed and mitigated to ensure that this and every other article is free from commercial bias.
Jonathan D Trobe MD
Dr. Trobe of the University of Michigan has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See ProfileNearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.
Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.
Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.
Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.
MedLink, LLC
3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122
Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400
US Number: +1-619-640-4660
Support: service@medlink.com
Editor: editor@medlink.com
ISSN: 2831-9125
Neuro-Oncology
May. 27, 2026
General Child Neurology
May. 12, 2026
Infectious Disorders
May. 01, 2026
Neurogenetic Disorders
Apr. 30, 2026
General Child Neurology
Apr. 29, 2026
Neuropharmacology & Neurotherapeutics
Apr. 23, 2026
Infectious Disorders
Apr. 08, 2026
Neuro-Ophthalmology & Neuro-Otology
Apr. 07, 2026