Sign Up for a Free Account
  • Updated 06.20.2025
  • Released 04.18.2001
  • Expires For CME 06.20.2028

Functional neurologic disorder and related disorders

Author
Victor W Mark MD
See Contributor Disclosures
Cite this article

Cite this article

Introduction

Overview

This article reviews functional neurologic disorder, factitious disorder imposed on self (previously called Munchausen syndrome), factitious disorder imposed on another (previously called Munchausen syndrome by proxy), and Ganser syndrome. These behavioral disorders are similar in their (1) resemblance to more familiar neurologic disorders, (2) lack of established objective biomarkers from conventional medical work-up (eg, structural lesions on brain imaging studies), and (3) aggravation of symptoms or those reported by a caregiver because of the patient’s or caregiver’s attention to the symptoms. However, the features and causes of these disorders differ significantly from one another. This article also reviews several widespread manifestations of functional neurologic disorder, including Havana syndrome (now called “anomalous health incidents”), mass psychogenic illness that is disseminated by social media, and post-vaccination functional neurologic disorder, in particular following COVID disease vaccination. For functional neurologic disorder, new biomarkers are being intensively investigated and are reviewed here.

Key points

• Functional neurologic disorder is commonly encountered in general neurologic practices and, hence, knowing its manifestations and treatment is crucial for clinical care.

• The disturbance is involuntary, and yet at the same time, it can be intermittently improved by the patient, depending on the patient’s reduced attention to the deficits.

• Although it can be improved intermittently by the patient, the disturbance is generally disabling unless expert professional care intervenes.

• There is no consistent association between functional neurologic disorder and either posttraumatic emotional stress, psychiatric disease, or sexual abuse.

• The terms Munchausen syndrome and its related disorder, Munchausen by proxy, are gradually being replaced in the research literature with the terms factitious disorder imposed on self and factitious disorder imposed on another, respectively.

• Anomalous healthy incidents, purported to represent acute brain injury resulting from exposure to either electromagnetic microwave or subsonic waves from weapons directed at diplomatic employees, have been found not to have a specific neuropathology. This raises the question of whether traumatic brain injury is responsible. Functional neurologic disorder is the more plausible explanation.

Historical note and terminology

"Hysteria" was the original term in Western medicine for fluctuating and disabling neurologic disorder in alert sufferers, which was attributed from classical times to a "wandering uterus" because of its predominance in women (296). Offray de La Mettrie, for example, published in 1738 an account of episodic catalepsy (waxy immobility of the limbs) in a woman that he attributed to hysteria arising from amenorrhea (283). Eighteenth-century treatments for hysteria were radical and untested, including bloodletting, beatings, diet, fresh air, and writing (178).

Broca’s 1861 seminal and replicated discovery that aphasia follows from a focal lesion in the brain, as found on autopsy, more often in the left cerebral hemisphere, inspired subsequent neuroscientists to trace other neurobehavioral disorders to specific brain regions (see the MedLink article, “Non-progressive aphasia”). Broca’s contemporary neuroscientist Briquet related functional neurologic disorder of both women and men also to cerebral disease, but in contrast to aphasia, these disorders did not leave visible lesions at autopsy (64). Nonetheless, Briquet relocalized functional neurologic disorder from the uterus to the brain. Reynolds published in 1869 a prescient overview of functional movement or sensory disorders that appeared to be based on an ideological fixation and were amenable to compassionate behavioral retraining (209). In 1888, Blocq comprehensively described a case series of the acute inability to stand and walk despite full motor control of the legs while the patients were supine, which he termed “astasia-abasia,” a term that continues today (191). Although he doubted that the disturbance had a purely psychological etiology, his pathophysiologic hypothesis—that marked emotional distress can aggravate cerebral inhibition over spinal walking mechanisms—is remarkably similar to current pathophysiologic hypotheses for functional disturbances. Late in his career, in the 1880s, Charcot opined that functional disorders emanated from focal disturbances of the nervous system, but which did not affect a specific part of the body. Therefore, Charcot hypothesized that functional neurologic disorder did not seem to result from a structural central nervous system lesion. Instead, he postulated that functional neurologic disorder may emerge from an anatomically “dynamic” lesion, for which extant neurologic examination techniques could not identify (105).

In the late 19th century, Freud (who, as a neurologist, attended Charcot’s clinical rounds and observed his demonstrations of hysteria in his patients) hypothesized that an unconscious and involuntary cognitive process called “conversion” caused functional neurologic disorder (43; 96). In this model, emotionally conflicting memories of young life abuse or other upsetting personal experiences are involuntarily repressed and “converted” to severe somatic involuntary disturbances years later. Although no experimental evidence for this process was adduced for this nonfalsifiable model, this concept became firmly established and continues today in contemporary medical care (54). Commonly, functional neurologic disorder is called “conversion disorder,” including in present-day medical diagnostic classifications for clinical billing.

Interest in functional neurologic disorder increased with World War I, when European soldiers returned from combat with a variety of fluctuating neurologic deficits without demonstrable physical traumatic brain injury (129; 160). This post-combat disorder was considered to be neurologic, though its etiology was unclear. However, the neurologic interest in the causes, physiologic basis, and treatment of functional disorder became overshadowed by the successful outcomes of psychoanalysis developed by Freud (64). Over the 20th century, the lack of rigorous empirical evidence for unconscious repression eventually led to a resurgence of research interest in the neurophysiological basis of functional disorder in the 1960s, which continues today.

A wide variety of synonyms for these disorders are used, which hampers understanding. Alternate terms for functional neurologic disorder include hysteria, conversion disorder, medically unexplained disorder, shell shock, combat neurosis, psychogenic neurologic disorder, and pseudoseizure. Edwards and Bhatia recommended the term “functional neurologic disorder” on the grounds that patients find this less objectionable than rival terms (255; 76), which emphasizes the potential reversibility of the disorder (208; 249). The term, however, says little, only that it indicates it “functions” as a neurologic disorder, but without referring specifically to its mechanism. From the perspectives of the patients, their illness is “dysfunctional,” not “functional” (128). In response, Mark proposed the alternate term “attentionally-modifiable disorder,” to emphasize that self-attention is key for the symptoms of functional neurologic disorder (166).

PubMed shows an increasing use of the term “functional neurologic disorder” or the alternate terms “functional neurological disorder” and “functional neurological symptom disorder” since 2005. The term “anomalous health incidents” was more recently introduced in the medical literature after multiple government employees for the US State Department abruptly developed multiple sensory disturbances while they were posted in foreign locations. The term refers to “the abrupt onset of disruptive symptoms, including dizziness, pain, visual problems, and cognitive dysfunction,” according to the United States Government, and replaces the term “Havana syndrome” (95; 55; 204).

"Somatization disorder" or "Briquet syndrome" is a variant of functional disorder in which diverse bodily complaints (eg, fatigue, insomnia, irritable bowel) occur without resembling specific neurologic disorders and without objective physiologic evidence (138; 249). "Malingering" is the fully aware simulation of a medical disorder (frequently neurologic) for personal gain, particularly for money, material goods, or improved access to specific privileges (eg, transfer from jail). "Factitious disorder" is the willful simulation of a medical disorder without clear financial or opportunistic gain (21). Instead, sufferers have a need for a greater sense of control or attention. "Factitious disorder imposed on self” is a form of factitious disorder (often with diverse complaints) in which the patient undergoes frequent clinic or hospital evaluation, sometimes resulting in invasive, even injurious, testing or treatment. The term was originally coined as “Munchausen syndrome” by Asher (10), who thought that the wide meanderings of afflicted patients from clinic to clinic and their elaborate health histories resembled the fantastic travels regaled by a fictitious character depicted by Raspe in 1785, Baron Munchausen (196). In contrast, “factitious disorder imposed on another” refers to a caregiver's bearing false evidence of medical illness in another individual who is incompetent to represent himself (a child in most cases) (177). The term was originally termed “Munchausen syndrome by proxy,” and was changed to the present term to draw attention to the psychopathology of the perpetrator (04). Ganser syndrome involves the inconsistent answering of questions concerning the patient’s fund of knowledge (either general facts or autobiographical information), where the answers are closely related to the correct answers (99).

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

  • Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.

  • Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.

  • Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.

  • Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125