Sign Up for a Free Account
  • Updated 10.26.2023
  • Released 12.16.2003
  • Expires For CME 10.26.2026

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes

Introduction

Overview

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is characterized by recurrent, severe “thunderclap” headaches and multifocal cerebral arterial narrowing and dilatation, often complicated by ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes or reversible brain edema. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes affect young individuals, mostly women, and have been associated with diverse conditions such as pregnancy, migraine, vasoconstrictive drug use, pheochromocytoma, and neurosurgical procedures. With the publication of comprehensive review articles and large case series and the advent of relatively noninvasive diagnostic tests such as CT-angiography and MR-angiography, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes are being recognized and diagnosed more frequently. Some cases are misdiagnosed as primary angiitis of the CNS because of overlapping clinical-angiographic features. In this article, the author provides a comprehensive overview of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes.

Key points

• Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes are an instantly recognizable entity. They have distinct clinical, laboratory, imaging, and angiographic features that allow easy diagnosis and distinction from mimics such as cerebral vasculitis and ruptured brain aneurysms.

• Most patients present with recurrent thunderclap headaches.

• Ischemic stroke, brain hemorrhage, and cerebral edema can develop in approximately 35% to 40% of patients within the first one to three weeks. Yet, approximately 95% of patients have benign 3-month outcomes with little or no residual neurologic deficits

• The RCVS2 score accurately distinguishes reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes from other intracranial arteriopathies.

• Because the natural history of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is spontaneous resolution within a few weeks, simple observation with liberal pain control and avoidance of physical exertion is usually adequate. Calcium-channel blockers may reduce the intensity of headaches. Glucocorticoids should be avoided. Intraarterial vasodilator therapy should be reserved for the rare patient with unrelenting clinical progression.

• Calcium-channel blockers may reduce the intensity of headaches. Glucocorticoids should be avoided. Intraarterial vasodilator therapy should be reserved for the rare patient with unrelenting clinical progression.

Historical note and terminology

Angiographic narrowing of intracerebral arteries usually results from pathological conditions such as atherosclerosis, inflammatory vasculitis, infectious arteritis, and fibromuscular dysplasia. Reversible cerebral arterial vasoconstriction has been considered a rare phenomenon, except when associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (“vasospasm”). However, over the last six decades, numerous case reports have documented reversible multifocal cerebral vasoconstriction on serial angiography in patients without aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and without evidence for infection or inflammation. Descriptions of this phenomenon date back to the 1960s (02; 09; 110). Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction has been associated with diverse conditions including the postpartum state, use of vasoconstrictive drugs, migraine, thunderclap headache, other primary headaches, cerebral trauma, and hypertensive encephalopathy, among others (Table 1).

Table 1. Precipitating Factors Associated with Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndromes

(A) Pregnancy and puerperium

Early puerperium, late pregnancy, eclampsia, pre-eclampsia, delayed post-partum eclampsia

(B) Headache disorders

Migraine, primary thunderclap headache, benign exertional headache, benign sexual headache, primary cough headache, bath-related headache (119)

(C) Physiologic

High altitude, winter climate, cold water exposure, typhoons, severe grief

(D) Exposure to drugs
and blood products

Sympathomimetic medications: phenylpropanolamine, pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine, epinephrine, ergotamine tartrate, isometheptene, midodrine, methylergonovine, bromocriptine, methergine, lisuride
Antidepressants: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)
Migraine medications: sumatriptan and other triptans, erenumab (117)
Anti-inflammatory: indomethacin, etoricoxib
Illicit drugs: cocaine, ecstasy, amphetamine derivatives, marijuana, lysergic acid diethylamide
Immunosuppressants/immunomodulators: tacrolimus (FK-506), cyclophosphamide, interferon, fingolimod, etanercept, tocilizumab, ustekinumab, adalidumab
Hormonal agents: oral contraceptive pills, ovarian stimulation, isoflavones, levonorgestrel (145)
Other: Hydroxycut, bromocriptine, erythropoietin, intravenous immune globulin (IVIg), nicotine patches, red blood cell transfusions, methotrexate (153), intrathecal cytarabine (91), licorice, Ma Huang (ephedra), khat leaves, atovaquone, caffeine withdrawal, eucalyptus, isoflavone, ethylene oxide exposure, tetrodotoxin, oleoresin capsicum (pepper spray), ferric carboxymaltose (100)

(E) Procedures

carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting, neurosurgical procedures, tonsillectomy, neck surgery, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, dural puncture

(F) Miscellaneous

Hypercalcemia, porphyria, hemolytic uremic syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, pheochromocytoma, bronchial carcinoid tumor, unruptured saccular cerebral aneurysm, head trauma, spinal subdural hematoma, carotid glomus tumor, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, transient global amnesia, Covid-19 infection (111), Covid-19 vaccination (87), Leigh syndrome, elevated anti-phospholipid antibodies (142), thyrotoxicosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, Chikungunya infection (141), Leigh syndrome (106)

(G) Idiopathic

No identifiable precipitating factor.

Given the diversity of the associated conditions, patients with these syndromes have been described in the literature using variable nosology. For example, “migrainous vasospasm” (121) or “migraine angiitis” (62) for patients with prior migraine; “postpartum angiopathy” (110; 05; 109) when associated with pregnancy or puerperium; and “drug-induced vasculitis” (70) when associated with drug exposure. At the 1987 Boston Stroke Society meeting, Marie Fleming presented two patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction. The following year Drs. Call, Fleming, C Miller Fisher, and others described these patients and several additional personal cases in a series titled “Reversible Cerebral Segmental Vasoconstriction” (14).

Over the past decade, Singhal and others have recognized that despite the wide range of associated conditions and varied nosology, these patients have an easily recognizable clinical-imaging syndrome characterized by severe headaches and reversible cerebral angiographic abnormalities, often complicated by seizures and ischemic or hemorrhagic stokes. Consequently, these syndromes are now collectively referred to as “reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes,” (RCVS) and multiple publications have characterized reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes over the last few years (134; 124; 130; 10; 34; 22; 35; 127; 33; 159; 128; 30; 16). It is conceivable that individual entities still have some unique features. The International Headache Society has developed criteria for diagnosis, which have been validated, and the latest version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) has assigned code I67.841 for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes (83).

Historically, patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes have been misinterpreted as having primary angiitis of the central nervous system due to overlapping clinical-imaging features such as headache, stroke, and angiographic abnormalities (138; 04; 150). Before the recognition of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes, primary angiitis of the central nervous system had become recognized and accepted as a devastating and potentially fatal inflammatory condition that warranted aggressive treatment with immunosuppressive agents (11). Segmental narrowing of intracranial arteries was believed to be the “typical” angiographic feature of primary angiitis of the central nervous system. Among patients with primary angiitis of the central nervous system, there emerged a subset of patients who had an unusually benign clinical course and prompt resolution of angiographic abnormalities without prolonged immunosuppressive therapy. Calabrese and colleagues classified these patients as “benign angiopathy of the CNS” (BACNS) and noted that they were usually diagnosed solely on the basis of angiographic abnormalities, without supporting evidence for inflammation on tests like CSF examination or brain biopsy (12). Their group has analyzed the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of BACNS and concluded that it is probably a vasoconstrictive rather than a vasculitic condition (52).

Important differences between primary angiitis of the central nervous system and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes have been highlighted, namely the type and frequency of onset headaches, lesion patterns on brain imaging, and distinct cerebral angiographic features (136; 32). Recurrent thunderclap headache (TCH), and single thunderclap headache associated with normal neuroimaging, border zone infarcts, or vasogenic edema, was shown to have 100% positive predictive value for diagnosing reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. The criteria make it possible to distinguish these conditions soon after admission with nearly 100% accuracy. However, severe and prolonged vasoconstriction can induce secondary inflammation and arterial necrosis with brain hemorrhages, for example, after use of potent vasoconstrictors, making the distinction between vasculitis and vasoconstriction extremely difficult in some cases (13; 147).

Aiming to differentiate reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes from other intracranial arteriopathies, the RCVS2 diagnostic score (Table 2) and clinical approach has been developed (114). RCVS2 scores ≥5 are highly specific (99%) and sensitive (90%) for diagnosing reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes, whereas scores ≤2 are highly specific (100%) and sensitive (85%) for excluding reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Intermediate RCVS2 scores of 3 or 4 have a lower specificity (86%) and sensitivity (10%) for diagnosing reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. For patients with intermediate scores, using a clinical approach based on the presence of recurrent thunderclap headaches, vasoactive triggers with normal brain imaging, or the presence of convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage improved diagnostic accuracy. An external cohort validated the RCVS2 score with a specificity of 94% and sensitivity of 64% (78).

Table 2. RCVS2 Score

Criteria

Value

Recurrent or single thunderclap headache
Present
Absent


5
0

Carotid artery (intracranial)
Affected
Not affected


-2
0

Vasoconstrictive Trigger
Present
Absent


3
0

Sex
Female
Male


1
0

Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Present
Absent


1
0

Another scoring system was created for diagnosis of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes in patients with thunderclap headache (TCH) (29). The RCVS-TCH score takes into account the pattern of thunderclap headache (recurrent or single), sex, triggering factors, and blood pressure surge. High scores have high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. However, because aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were excluded from the analysis, and because patients with primary thunderclap headache (which falls within the spectrum of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome) were not considered as having reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, the clinical utility of this scoring system remains undetermined.

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

  • Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.

  • Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.

  • Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.

  • Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink®, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125