Sign Up for a Free Account
  • Updated 10.14.2025
  • Released 08.08.1994
  • Expires For CME 10.14.2028

Tethered spinal cord

Authors
Dilek S Sen MD, Richard Anderson MD, Bernard L Maria MD
See Contributor Disclosures
Editor
Bernard L Maria MD
Cite this article

Cite this article

Introduction

Overview

Tethered spinal cord is a condition in which spinal cord movement within the spinal column is limited. Excessive tension on the spinal cord leads to tethered cord syndrome, which can manifest as pain, motor or sensory deficits, and bowel and bladder dysfunction. Because most cases are primary or related to congenital spinal dysraphism, patients typically present in childhood, adolescence, or early adulthood (77; 54). Secondary, or acquired, etiologies of tethered cord syndrome include spinal cord neoplasm, infection, or fibrosis (34; 136); consequently, delayed presentation can occur (54). In October 2024, given the wide variation in current clinical practices, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality commissioned a systematic review of the diagnosis and treatment of tethered spinal cord, which provided evidence for the use of MRI or ultrasound for diagnosis (54). In symptomatic patients, surgical detethering improved neurologic outcomes and complications associated with open detethering surgery, while underscoring the need for stronger studies to guide diagnosis and treatment. Diagnosis of tethered cord syndrome is made primarily by clinical assessments and imaging. Although the need for surgical treatment is straightforward in some cases--for example, in a symptomatic patient with a low-lying conus and a fatty filum (131)--a case-by-case evaluation is necessary (77; 54). For instance, patients who undergo myelomeningocele closure appear tethered on MRI; however, only 40% require subsequent untethering (18). Furthermore, natural history and symptom progression rates differ among patients (54). In this article, the authors describe the etiology, pathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of tethered cord syndrome.

Key points

• Tethered cord syndrome describes a constellation of symptoms secondary to tethering of the spinal cord.

• Symptoms of tethered cord syndrome usually arise in childhood but sometimes present during adolescence or adulthood (104).

• When symptoms arise in adulthood, the underlying pathology is usually caused by occult spinal dysraphism (104).

• Occult tethered cord syndrome is increasingly being recognized, presenting with either pain or urological symptoms in adults or children, respectively.

• Failure to timely diagnose and treat tethered cord syndrome results in worse long-term outcomes.

• Neurologists are often the medical providers who make the diagnosis.

• Radiological diagnosis is confirmed with conus medullaris position below the L2-L3 disc space on MRI and may demonstrate filum terminale thickness greater than 2 mm.

• Early operative detethering is proposed by many neurosurgeons to prevent neurologic, orthopedic, or urological deficits from developing or worsening (104).

• A goal of initial surgery is to prevent recurrent tethering, which can occur in up to 50% of patients (104).

Historical note and terminology

In 1641, a Dutch physician named Nicholas Tulp was the first to use the term “spina bifida” (60). In 1761, Giovan Morgagni, the father of organ pathology, described a relationship between hydrocephalus and spina bifida (22). In 1857, A. Johnson described a young child with worsening lower extremity symptoms in whom a lesion consistent with a lipoma was found during exploratory surgery, and symptoms resolved when the spinal cord was freed from its dural attachments (61). In 1875, Virchow introduced the term “spina bifida occulta” (60).

The first untethering operation was reported by Jones in 1891 in a 22-year-old patient presenting with clubfoot deformities, lower extremity atrophy and pain, and voiding difficulties who underwent division of a “dense adventitious fibrous band” (63). The patient showed improvement 6 months after surgery. In 1910, Fuchs reported in patients with myelomeningocele incontinence induced by flexion (36).

In 1916, a neurologist, WG Spiller, first described the phenomenon of activity exacerbating symptoms in two adolescent patients after a rowing exercise, which highlighted the importance of early diagnosis in providing anticipatory guidance for activity avoidance (120).

In 1918, WM Brickner reported a correlation between early treatment and improved outcomes and proposed prophylactic treatment “in the hope of obviating the development of symptoms during adolescence” (20).

Different forms of spinal dysraphism were described over the next few decades, resulting in similar symptomatology (61; 20).

In 1940, Lichtenstein reported a relationship between spinal cord dysfunction and tethering lesions (78). In 1953, Garceau documented three patients with worsening spinal deformity and neurologic function, with reported recovery in patients with filum resection (38; 21; 31). Garceau hypothesized that a lesion in the filum terminale caused tension on the conus medullaris and coined filum terminale syndrome. Supporting evidence that the filum was under excessive tension came a few years later from Jones and Love, who reported recovery of neurologic and urologic functions after sectioning a tight filum and retracting the cut ends in six patients (62).

In 1976, Hoffman, Hendrick, and Humphreys published a landmark study and coined the term tethered spinal cord in patients with (1) a low-lying conus medullaris and (2) a thick filum terminale (diameter greater than 2 mm) (52). The study included 31 children, excluding those having obvious spinal dysraphisms, and documented variable presentations of tethered spinal cord, the role of myelography, making a diagnosis based on clinical suspicion despite normal imaging, and positive outcomes with surgical intervention. (52; 104). Since Hoffman and colleagues’ study, the definition of tethered spinal cord has been expanded to include various etiologies, and the pathophysiology has been proposed to involve mechanical traction, metabolic abnormalities, and changes in spinal cord blood flow (65). Studies rely mostly on animal models, which have limited ability to mimic human physiology (54).

In 1981, Yamada and colleagues showed that a tethered cord is linked with metabolic abnormalities by studying cytochrome c enzyme in mitochondria of humans and cats (145). They showed that increased traction on the spinal cord, induced by hanging weights, was associated with hypoxia, metabolic changes, and energy depletion; furthermore, the degree of metabolic impairment correlated with the severity of neurologic symptoms. Their results had strong implications for intervention: surgical untethering yielded a return to a normal metabolic state in mild or moderate redox changes and subsequent neurologic improvement. However, in more severe states, limited metabolic changes and neurologic changes were seen, suggesting that early intervention is key for prognosis (145; 143; 34). Research in the animal model was improved by Huang and colleagues, who produced chronic slow traction to more closely mimic the progressive nature of the disease (55). In 1987, Kang and colleagues demonstrated that untethering in kittens can improve spinal cord blood flow (65). However, in patients with tethered spinal cords compared with controls, no change in blood flow has been documented, and chronic ischemic injury has not been proven on a histological level (54).

Clinical evaluation and imaging remain the main criteria for diagnosis. Nonetheless, a normal appearance of the filum does not imply normal function. Selcuki and colleagues reported 13 patients with a normal level conus medullaris and incontinence who had improved continence after tight filum terminale resection (112; 113). As such, our current understanding of this syndrome is a complex lesion with heterogeneous causes (56; 02; 77; 142; 143). Operative care has advanced over the last few decades.

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

  • Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.

  • Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.

  • Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.

  • Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125